Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Wolfgang Laib at MoMA
Thinking about, as we were, satisfying uses of MoMA’s Atrium, Wolfgang Laib’s large piece, Pollen from Hazelnut, with its lovely wispy edges, was installed today (up through March 11th). Although it was put on the calendar over a year ago, it comes at the right psychological moment: the perfect antidote to Martha Rosler’s garage sale (see below), it’s a harbinger of spring at winter’s darkest moment, embodying a spirit of optimism many people feel about 2013. No photos from MoMA are yet available, but at least the iPhone captures the glow. (You can read my cover story on Laib's work, Art in America, 2001, here.)
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
On fear
Happy 2013! I haven’t thought of a thing to Vent about after
a month of mental housecleaning in the form of daily kundalini yoga and
meditation at Golden Bridge Yoga
in L.A. Then last night, a friend told me about a friend of hers, a filmmaker
who, frightened of giving a museum talk, discovered beta-blockers—and what my
friend, who hadn’t heard about them, considered an exciting breakthrough, I saw
as a missed opportunity.
So the filmmaker took the beta-blockers, and what she gained
was a successful museum talk, which is now over, and the knowledge that if she
has a problem, she can take a pill. But what if she’d seen it as a challenge
she could train for and conquer? She might have gained confidence and skills
she could draw on for the rest of her life.
(I see curators stumbling through presentations, and I
think, get a coach! This is part of your job, why not get good at it? In fact
the museums would benefit if they regarded this as an integral part of job
training.)
My friend, Hugeutte,
was 52 when she decided to overcome her lifelong fear of driving a car. The
driving teacher warned her that few first-timers over 30 can become good
drivers, but was willing to give her a test drive. Huguette performed well on
the test drive, took lessons, and later said, “I know I’ll be a better painter for
having learned to drive.”
I have no problem speaking in public—in fact I love it—but
it was not always thus. My first experience was when I was 24, working on a
political campaign and being interviewed by telephone for a radio show, which
resulted in what seemed like an eternity, but was no doubt only seconds of
terrifying dead time. I remember watching my co-workers in the office with
their ears to the radio listening to.…nothing. And while I later became a slam
poet who, a friend said, only needed a stage, microphone, and an audience of
200 to feel entirely comfortable, I did harbor a secret public performance
phobia: the piano.
I started playing when I was five and in the middle of my
first recital at seven or eight – I remember a white hall and a big black shiny
grand piano – I went blank. My teacher had to run and get the music, and I was
mortified. Despite 20 more years of rigorous classical training, only my
neighbors* knew I could play. My teacher, Lili
Simon, who studied at the Liszt Academy
of Music in Budapest with Bartok (his picture was next to the piano), used
to pile her family and neighbors onto the couch in the living room when I
played, but it was hopeless. Then 15 years ago, a friend who knew of my secret ability,
asked me to play at her wedding—an utterly horrific suggestion, which I
immediately refused. Fortunately, however, by that time I had done enough
personal growth work to recognize that the fear was a signal that, if I was to
continue to grow, I had to do it. Eek!
Valerie Dillon, a concert
pianist turned art dealer who lived nearby in SoHo, offered me a key to her
loft and daily use of her Steinway grand. “The only antidote to stage fright,”
she said, “is practice.” I played an hour a day for at least six weeks until
that Chopin mazurka and two pieces by Bach felt as if they were part of my DNA.
Needless to say the wedding went off smoothly, but was almost an anti-climax,
because by that time I could have done it in my sleep.
But all this is trifling compared to my friend, Wylie Goodman, who took a leave
from her job with the New York City Parks Department and is now completing a
six-month bicycling and Couchsurfing
tour of Asia on her own. Do you think there was no fear there? I saw her just before
she left, after months of training and preparation, when the reality hit her
and she asked, “Am I out of my fucking mind?”
This is one of my favorite Wylie anecdotes from Facebook:
(November 12, 2012) And now for today's feel-good story: two 11
or 12-year-old boys started biking alongside me, as kids often do here, yelling
"hello" or "where are you from?" when one started singing,
"Hey, sexy lady!" I did a double take, stopped riding, called out,
"wait!" – and pulled out my iPhone with its downloaded "Gangnam Style" song.
We all smiled and started doing the move. At that moment, I felt like the
coolest 48-year-old white lady in Vietnam.
Wylie, saying goodbye to bicycle #1, January 10, 2013 in Cambodia
* As young marrieds, my ex-husband and I
used to play the Haydn
Trumpet Concerto (he on the trumpet, me playing the orchestral part on the piano) in our Evanston courtyard apartment. One day I
ran into one of my neighbors who said, “I thought of you the other night. We
went to the Chicago Symphony and they performed the Haydn Trumpet Concerto—it was
great, except they left out the part where he yells at her about the time.”
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Not radical II: Ann Hamilton at the Park Avenue Armory
The author, working up an appetite
I just can't get into the radical masquerade that the art
world is.
I wrote this on 12-12-12, at
36,000 feet on a Jet Blue flight to L.A. and when I landed, the earth was still
there. But even if there wasn’t a galactic shift, perhaps we can create one in
the art world—that, at least, is within our control. My wish for art in the Aquarian Age, is that
that we take nothing for granted.
Last week I ranted about Martha Rosler’s
garage sale at MoMA. This
week I’ll reinforce my curmudgeon status with a non-response to Ann
Hamilton’s installation in the vast Parade Hall at the Park Avenue Armory. Like Rosler, Hamilton is somewhat sanctified, protected
by an aura of profundity she has cultivated, or has been cultivated for her, over the years.
I won’t describe the
installation – this is not a review – except to say that it concerns a long white
curtain that bisects the space, wooden swings on chains that cause the curtain panels
to move when visitors swing on them, live white doves incarcerated in wicker
basket/cages stacked on a table where a man and a woman attired in feathered capes
are reading something, and packages twee-ly wrapped with brown paper and twine
scattered here and there, containing speakers that emit voices. The real star
is the room.
Photograph:
Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images
Oh I know, I could have made
more of an effort. I could have listened more closely to the readings and relayed
voices (were they the same?). I could have spent more time on the swings. I
could have tried to figure out how the newsprint broadsheet of fuzzy
photographs contributes to the whole.
Or I could go to lunch.
No doubt I'll be roundly criticized for dismissing something I haven’t fully explored—except I
believe it’s the artist’s responsibility to engage me, not the other way
around. I have no compunction about putting down a book halfway through, and
if, in the middle of a play or concert, I find myself doing eye exercises or worrying
about my bills, I don’t blame myself. I don’t underestimate the power of really
great art to sweep me away. I think about how I once had a massive migraine
that miraculously disappeared during a performance of Taming of the Shrew in Central Park with Raul Julia and Meryl
Streep. Or the time my boy friend and I had a colossal fight on the way to see
an early Cirque du Soleil, and went home in love. I could go on and on…Christian Marclay’s
The Clock (which I finally left after 2 ½ hours only because I had
to pee), Janet Cardiff and George
Bures Miller’s genius Pandemonium at Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary, Olafur Eliasson's The Weather Project at the Tate Modern (in an even more humungous space)....concerts
by Sigur Ros…yes, such experiences are few and far between, but why
lower the bar? Why should I spend my time trying to figure out what an artist
is trying to convey, when I could be eating a splendid lamb tagine at Café Mogador?
As my friend, Roberto, observed so accurately in the taxi on our way downtown: I’m fatigued by the expectation of
the system that I’ll play along completely.
I also don’t think that birds
should have to suffer for art, any more than I should.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Martha Rosler's Garage Sale: not radical
From Martha Rosler's Meta-Monumental Garage Sale at MoMA
When is radical art not radical? When it’s a Meta-Monumental Garage Sale at MoMA. No one, including me, wants to get on Martha Rosler’s case, because her intentions are so good. She’s a feminist who’s against war and into exposing the falsities of the gallery/museum system—nothing I wouldn’t whole-heartedly agree with. Except, instead of satisfying an “enduring taste for subversion” (see the New Yorker article), Rosler’s MoMA venture (November 17-30) was just another case of bullshit masquerading as art. “Subversion” would be if I got a cart and attempted to sell used T-shirts on the sidewalk in front of MoMA or, God forbid, in the lobby—an event that would immediately reveal just how tolerant the museum really is of purveyors of second-hand shit on their premises. The only reason Rosler gets to sell stuff at MoMA and Joe Schmo doesn’t, is because she knows how to navigate the museum system—and by doing so blatantly exposes herself as a player in the exclusive milieu she’s made a career of railing against.
When is radical art not radical? When it’s a Meta-Monumental Garage Sale at MoMA. No one, including me, wants to get on Martha Rosler’s case, because her intentions are so good. She’s a feminist who’s against war and into exposing the falsities of the gallery/museum system—nothing I wouldn’t whole-heartedly agree with. Except, instead of satisfying an “enduring taste for subversion” (see the New Yorker article), Rosler’s MoMA venture (November 17-30) was just another case of bullshit masquerading as art. “Subversion” would be if I got a cart and attempted to sell used T-shirts on the sidewalk in front of MoMA or, God forbid, in the lobby—an event that would immediately reveal just how tolerant the museum really is of purveyors of second-hand shit on their premises. The only reason Rosler gets to sell stuff at MoMA and Joe Schmo doesn’t, is because she knows how to navigate the museum system—and by doing so blatantly exposes herself as a player in the exclusive milieu she’s made a career of railing against.
“The Garage Sale [says
the MoMA press
release]…implicates visitors in face-to-face transactions within a
secondary, informal cash economy—just
like [my italics] garage sales held outside a museum setting.” You gotta be kidding.
Rosler’s Garage Sale was as much like
a real garage sale as Lindsay Lohan is like Elizabeth Taylor. First of all, it was
stylized and artificial – from the giant American flag on the wall to the tags,
cutesy signs, and arrangements of goods that were clearly the work of an artist
pretending to have a garage sale (for instance if someone bought something that
was tacked to the wall, they had to wait until the event was over to collect
it, so as not to disturb the display). Further, it was in a museum and the visitors who paid $25 to experience it did
not look like people who would normally consider incorporating second-hand
items into their lives – in other words, they were slumming.
I get pissed off when the art world plays at – and therefore mocks – the lives of others,
especially “suburbia” and the now mythical “middle class.” If I see one more arty photograph of a supposedly
anonymous ranch house I’ll scream.
However buying and selling second hand-items—i.e.
“junk” – is what some people do for a living. They know where to find the stuff, how to price and sell it. It’s how
they get by.
Others are forced to sell their
belongings in order to raise cash to pay the mortgage or next month’s rent. As
for the buyers, there are people out there who wear second-hand clothing not
for a lark, but because it’s only way they can afford to cover their backs.
Therefore, to
invite members of the elite to paw through over-priced discarded items seemed remarkably
insensitive, not the least because of its timing—immediately following
Hurricane Sandy, when the belongings of so many were reduced to just such piles,
only logged with water.
But garage sales as the
iconic activity of the suburban not-desperate are about excess, accumulations
of stuff that have to be regularly purged.
But, it was
pointed out to me, this exhibition was planned years ago. So what? It’s conceptual art. If Warner Brothers can remake scenes from a multimillion-dollar
film in the
wake of a theater shooting, why can’t art, especially conceptual art, respond
to the times? As I suggested below, Rosler could have donated everything and
left the atrium empty, as the hurricane left so many homes empty.
Again, I’m
really tired of accumulations of detritus in all its forms pretending to be
art, like Karen Kilimnik or Song Dong, the Chinese artist who laid out his mother’s
possessions at MoMA in 2009 and recently at London’s Barbicon. Could we please just make something for a
change? Or at the very least, attempt to transform it, as Tommy Lanigan-Schmidt does so beautifully in his
work, now at MoMA/PS1.
There's nothing about "institutional critique" that a great work of art doesn't do better. Toward that end, Olafur Eliasson's swinging fan in MoMA's atrium said it all.
Olafur Eliasson, Ventilator, 1997: Photo by C-Monster
There's nothing about "institutional critique" that a great work of art doesn't do better. Toward that end, Olafur Eliasson's swinging fan in MoMA's atrium said it all.
Olafur Eliasson, Ventilator, 1997: Photo by C-Monster
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





